1) What does Fortuna do?
Fortuna provides data-driven token validation for presales and related token pages. It aggregates public signals and presents structured score, risk and context indicators.
Frequently asked questions about Fortuna, presales, tokenomics, liquidity pools and core crypto risk metrics.
Fortuna provides data-driven token validation for presales and related token pages. It aggregates public signals and presents structured score, risk and context indicators.
No. Fortuna does not execute trades and does not custody funds. It is an informational validation platform.
No. Fortuna does not provide financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. You should perform independent research before acting.
Refresh frequency depends on data source and pipeline timing. Some indicators update frequently, while others depend on source availability and chain activity.
Scores can change when contract state, liquidity, ownership, distribution, sale status, or social signals change.
Start with status, Trust Score, and Risk Tags. Then review contract checks, presale details, liquidity context, and distribution data.
No. Use multiple signals together. A single metric can be misleading without technical and market context.
Listing does not imply endorsement. Fortuna lists tokens for transparency and analysis, including those with elevated risk indicators.
Contact support with the token name, chain, contract address and a clear description of the issue so it can be reviewed.
Fortuna is useful for explorers, researchers, communities, and builders who need a structured way to review presale token risk.
A presale is an early token sale phase before broader market availability, usually with defined caps, timelines and participation rules.
Soft cap is the minimum intended raise; hard cap is the maximum. Both affect sale structure and risk expectations.
Vesting controls when tokens unlock. Poor vesting design can create sell pressure and short-term volatility.
High concentration means fewer wallets control more supply, which can increase manipulation, governance and dump risk.
Inflation risk is the possibility that increasing supply reduces price support or changes token economics over time.
FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) estimates valuation using total supply. A very high FDV versus circulating value can indicate future dilution pressure.
It is the amount of tokens currently available in the market, excluding locked or unreleased allocations.
Burns can affect supply dynamics, but they do not automatically make a token safe. Contract controls and ownership still matter.
Very large team allocations, unclear treasury rules, and short vesting cliffs are common warning patterns.
Because tokenomics claims can conflict with contract reality. Permissions may allow behaviour not reflected in public narratives.
A liquidity pool is a smart-contract pool of paired assets used for decentralised trading and market making.
Liquidity lock restricts LP token movement for a set period. It can reduce immediate liquidity-removal risk, though it is not a full safety guarantee.
Slippage is the difference between expected and executed trade price. It is often higher in low-liquidity or highly volatile pools.
Market capitalisation is token price multiplied by circulating supply. It gives a broad size estimate, not intrinsic value.
TVL (Total Value Locked) is the value of assets locked in a protocol or contract ecosystem and is often used as a participation signal.
Yes. Liquidity depth alone is insufficient; ownership permissions, mint controls and concentration risk can still be severe.
Volume can be inflated by speculative cycles or artificial activity. It should be interpreted alongside contract and distribution checks.
Price impact is the expected movement caused by your own trade size relative to available liquidity.
A rug pull is an abusive exit pattern where operators remove value or control in ways that leave participants exposed.
It generally means direct owner privileges were relinquished, but interpretation depends on full contract architecture and any alternate control paths.
Verification allows independent review of source code against deployed bytecode, improving transparency and auditability.
No. Strong social activity can coexist with weak technical safeguards. Treat hype as context, not proof.
Use Fortuna for structured screening, then verify key points independently across official project sources, blockchain explorers and trusted technical references.
Prioritise hard-risk indicators first (ownership, mint/admin controls, verification, liquidity structure), then evaluate softer social and narrative signals.